Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Making a list, checking it twice


It's more than a year away and this wedding is already taking up a huge chunk of my time. And the drama has already begun. Granted, its a slight drama, more at a "very special episode of a sitcom" level of drama than say, an "Ibsen" or "Chekhov" level of drama, but it is all just right around the corner. I can feel it.


Who to invite? This is the question. Do we invite 150 people assuming only 100 will come (since its a big trip for about half the potential guests), or do we invite 100 people, and end up with 75? Or can we do a second round of invitations once we get the initial RSVPs based on room? Or is that totally rude? And how many of our parents friends/cousins we barely know are we really obliged to invite?


This is not really a feminist dilemma, I am just consumed with thinking about this at the moment, and had to share.


Also, (and this is a tiny bit more along the lines of feminist issues) are we allowed to tell our friends to leave their kids at home? There will be some children there who are family members, and some infants who can't be away from moms, and some out-of-towners who will have a harder time finding a sitter in Winnipeg. But what about our local friends who think its cool to just bring their kids everywhere with them (and some of them are not the most under control kids, or the most hands on parents)? How do you say to some one, "you're invited, but leave little Johnny at home please?"


2 comments:

  1. i can't say i'm an expert but I believe the "no kids" thing is totally legit. i also think you've taken care of some of the hordes by having a shall we say "destination wedding". :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. We didn't invite anyone to our wedding that we wouldn't have over for dinner.

    As a mom, the "no kids" thing is fine, as long as it's clear and the rule apply to every one.

    ReplyDelete